by Joachim Martillo (ThorsProvoni@aol.com)
Chabad’s Zionization
The attack on Mumbai spotlights the ultra-orthodox (haredi) Chabad-Lubavitch community and its international outreach network. When Chabad outreach (keruv) started in the 1950s, it seemed rather intellectually dishonest because the organization used nostalgia for a never-existent Jewish past as a hook to enmesh secular or secularized Jews in ultra-orthodox (haredi) practice as hozrim bitshuvah (returnees, sometimes improperly called baalei tshuvah), but on the whole the activity was mostly harmless in contrast with current Chabad activities, which long ago crossed the border into dangerous territory.
As the Lubavitcher organization has become larger and wealthier — partially because mobilization for keruv has brought large contributions, members have shown a propensity for corruption.
(See Feds prepare for agriprocessors tax evasion, fraud charges)
Because outreach has brought into the Lubavitcher community many returnees educated or indoctrinated in the Soviet or Zionist systems, which were both similar and also genocidal, the Lubavitcher movement has itself become more conservative and more prone to support violence or to commit violence. (In Czarist Russia the Lubavitchers had the reputation as one of the rougher Chassidic groups, and they did manage to survive and thrive in the Crown Heights neighborhood as it declined and developed strong ethnic tensions.)
So far the Lubavitchers have not involved themselves quite as much in American politics as Aish haTorah and its alter ego The Clarion Fund, which overtly attempted to inject Islamophobia into the recent presidential election.
(See Followup: Obsession, Aish, Clarion Fund and Aish and Clarion Fund History.)
Yet, the Lubavitchers have worked closely with Jewish racists like Lawrence Summers and Alan Dershowitz in the ongoing attempt to control discourse on American campuses.
(See Fighting Hegemonic Blocking on Campus — Ousting Summers at Harvard and Harvard: Jews Better Than Muslims)
Although the Lubavitchers have remained nominally anti-Zionist, Lubavitcher anti-Goyism (anti-Gentilism) has led them into alliance with the most racist and violent Zionist parties and organizations in the State of Israel.
The wealthy Russian Lubavitcher hozer bitshuvah Lev Leviev openly supports Zionist terrorism and settlement building in the Palestinan occupied territories.
(See Settlers on Israel’s eastern frontier.)
Possibly because of Leviev Chabad-Lubavitch has openly become involved in Putin’s struggles with Russian Jewish oligarchs.
(See Chabad, Putin, Russian Oligarchs.)
The aforementioned activities alone are sufficient to have given many groups from Russian mafiosi to residents of Postville to angry Arabs reason to go gunning for Lubavitchers.
Still, there is an even more sinister aspect to the Lubavitcher organization.
Because Lubavitcher outreach offices are located in some of the most important political, corporate and university centers throughout the world, the Lubavitchers have put together a network that is incomparable for corporate and international espionage as well as for the secret exchange of information. Because Chabad Houses could potentially act as safe houses, where there would be no record of a person’s stay, the Lubavitcher outreach network is far superior to that of Aish HaTorah for covert operations.
Most people do not take the Lubavitchers seriously, but I have visited Chabad houses and encountered senior Israeli government or military officials (and probably intelligence agents). One can easily imagine that Neocon intelligentsia trying to develop a relationship with Hindutva intelligentsia or politicians might have used the Chabad Nariman House as a meeting place.
Because the Lubavitchers provide an unconditional welcome to all Jews in the hope of bringing them closer to the Lubavitcher way of life, not only have the Lubavitchers been open to potential subversion by Israeli intelligence organizations, but in general Mossad and Shin Bet have found it quite easy to penetrate the haredi community as the two organizations managed to do both in Israel and also in the USA during the Yossele Affair (See Israeli reunites with NY woman who helped in his abduction).
Jewish politics has often involved infiltration and subversion of one political group by another. It was a standard operating procedure of Jewish communists trying to take over labor unions both in Eastern Europe and in the USA. (The book Red Star over Hollywood describes the practice in Hollywood.) The David Project Israel Advocacy organization has used its educational programs as a means to infiltrate more mainstream Jewish communal organizations with radical Islamophobes and Jabotinskian Zionists.
To Zionize haredi groups that practice outreach, the Israeli government need only give encouragement to Zionistically indoctrinated Hebrew-speaking young people to participate in outreach programs, and in a few years the targeted haredi community is thoroughly enmeshed in Zionist thinking while Israeli intelligence organizations have a new crop of “saya`nim”;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sayanim in place ready to serve in Zionist covert operations.
The Lubavitcher shluchim (outreach emissaries) Gavriel Noach and Rivkah Holtzberg fit the saya`an profile to a “T” — especially Rivkah.
(See LA Chabad mourns couple slain in Mumbai.)
If the Israeli government wanted to put someone into a place with more direct influence over the leadership over the Lubavitchers or another Charedi group, it is just a matter of training agents with the proper intellectual skills to pose as hozrim bitshuvah (returnees). Within a few decades, Israeli intelligence would be running a large easily mobilized Charedi community while the ordinary haredi members would not have a clue.
An Israeli intelligence agency that started the program around the conclusion of the Yossele Affair would by now have had almost 50 years to perfect its ability to use groups of ultra-orthodox Jews for secret operations within the USA.
No one should be surprised that television programs like Sleeper Cell and 24 focus on the wrong religious group in developing stories about threatening foreign covert activities in the USA. The State of Israel placed operatives in Hollywood in the 50s and has been manipulating the US film industry ever since.
Who Is Behind the Attack?
The usual litany of blaming Pakistan and “Islamic Terror” groups has already started.
(See Al-Qaeda ‘hijack’ led to Mumbai attack and Mumbai attacks ‘were a ploy to wreck Obama plan to isolate al-Qaeda’.)
Because Pakistan desperately needs foreign aid, the Pakistani government almost certainly has no involvement in the Mumbai attack, which could have the effect of further destabilization of Pakistan.
In contrast, Neocon Zionists in the Pentagon have been advocating an anti-Pakistan policy since 2001 while the Israeli government may have an even more important reason to attack the Indian economy and the globalized economic system in general.
Arab sovereign wealth funds are expected to grow to $12 trillion in the near term and could give Arab countries more international influence than oil ever did.
Even though preventing the development of such influence is crucial in Jabotinskian/Revisionist thinking, this aspect of Jabotinski’s Iron Wall is rarely mentioned in English-language analysis of the themes of Zionist foreign policy. The leading Revisionist Zionist intellectuals like Jabotinski and Achimeir preferred free market capitalism within the ethnonational state, but they assumed ethnonational economic warfare as the defining characteristic of international economic relations. A Zionist effort to ruin the world economic order and to create global suspicion of Arab and Muslim investment is the immediate corollary of Neocon Zionist ideology.
Because India has generated tremendous hostility among Muslims with Hindutva policies, oppression in Kashmir, and cozying up to the State of Israel, there are many disaffected Muslim groups that would probably respond to the efforts of American or Israeli Zionist agents provocateurs, and both the USA and Zionists have a long history of instigating incidents by this means.
Scare-mongering against Arabs and Muslims and inciting Muslim reactions either via open provocations in the Palestinian Occupied Territories or via clandestine operations represent standard operating procedures among Zionists both in the Pentagon and in the Israeli government.
As the Bush administration winds down, it is easy to envision the transnational Jabotinskian Zionist (Neocon) intelligentsia making a final effort to build the “Economic Iron Wall” as high as possible before President Obama takes office.
Would Israel Sacrifice the Holtzbergs?
Zionists have always used dead Jews to build sympathy for Zionist goals and as cover for Zionist crimes against humanity.
Ben-Gurion explicitly stated that he would sacrifice German Jewish children for the sake of Zionism while the Zionist leadership probably learned the benefit of sacrificing Zionist operatives from the 1946 Kielce Pogrom. In this incident (Jewish) Soviet and Zionist agents probably worked together to make sure that surviving Polish Jews chose emigration to Palestine over a return to Poland as both the Soviet Union and the Zionist leadership desired at that time.
Because the Kielce Zionist recruiters were killed during the pogrom (either by pogromists or by [Jewish] Soviet agents), critical information about the crucial period leading up to the pogrom was rendered forever unobtainable.
Some reports of the Mumbai attack indicate that the Holtzbergs rented space to the attack planners over the past few months and thereby helped make the operation far more effective.
An opportunity to interrogate the Holtzbergs would have helped investigators immensely.
0 comments:
Post a Comment